Hi Michael, sorry for being late, but I want to add a question to the "shared memory" topic.
Michael Meeks wrote: > Hi there, > > I'm starting an 'interesting' step-wise re-factor of configmgr - > stripping out tons of complexity. It seems to be going well so far ;-) > [ removed the 'simpleheap' thing without too much difficulty ], but I'm > wondering: > > Is it ok up-stream to strip out all these poorly performing > side-effects of the (unused) shared-memory architecture ? :-) I don't remember what the proposed use cases for this architecture were. Maybe it's something that could be useful if we decided to use separate processes for each application? There are no plans to do so ATM but you never know... Best regards, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer - OpenOffice.org Application Framework Project Lead Please reply to the list only, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a spam sink. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
