Hi Christian,
On Tue, 2006-10-31 at 17:54 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
> An unfair cite.
;-) lets look at the context & contention:
> On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 23:57 +0100, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> > > You mix up some things here. Nobody said that we need a spec for
>>> each and every "tiny ergonomic fix".
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 02:27:23PM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > I refer you to the Sun rubric ** emphasis added.
...
> > "I Want to Change Something in OpenOffice.org - Do I Have to
> > Write a Software Specification?
> > **In general the answer is YES**. This applies to:
> > Features, Enhancements, **Defects**"
That page appears to say nothing to exclude tiny ergonomic fixes (for
defects) from the spec. process, -) Indeed they are clearly in the
"Behavioral changes of the UI". I think the current thrust of the
process is clear here.
> An unfair cite.
>
> it is "Defects **requiring the following type of changes**: <list of
> criteria>"
You don't cite include the relevant criteria either :-)
Regards,
Michael.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
