I don't have any current numbers, sorry. A good profiler for Windows is Intel VTune, evals can be downloaded.
Does the "Novell build" contain more optimizations than the "standard" build? Is it compiled/linked differently? Would you like to also measure the standard build on your machine? Thanks, Malte. Michael Meeks wrote, On 11/02/06 12:47: > Hi Malte, > > Just looking at startup performance on Win32 / Linux, and I have the > following numbers; was wondering if you see the same thing: > > cold warm > WinXP OO.o 14.5 4.0 [ OO.o 2.0.4 Sun build ] > Linux OO.o 10.8 2.4 [ OO.o 2.0.2 Novell build ] > MS Word 2.7 0.9 > > All times in seconds, all on the same hardware - Win32 times: > wall-clock + average of 3, time is to start a blank Writer document. > > So - I've been focusing on Linux optimisation, and we appear to have > left Windows behind. That's pretty interesting. > > Do you have any good profiling tools that break-down the 4 seconds of > warm start on Win32 ? [ or any free ones you can recommend ] on Linux of > course the configmgr is a big chunk of the profile, and I suspect that > on WinXP locking (which we hammer a lot there) is way more expensive, > but it's just a hunch :-) do you have good numbers here ? > > Thanks, > > Michael. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
