Joerg Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thorsten Behrens wrote: > > yes, I definitely think it's worth it. But please make it run > > automagically and unattended - just like the smoketest does. > > Do you agree on these two sentences? > The first step in introducing a process is that it should run stable. > The second step is to make it as easy as it is possible and economical. > > We are neither in the first or second phase of creating a process. We > are in the "finding process acceptable for all"-phase. Be sure that it > will be easy but we have to do it step-by-step. > Hi Jogi,
I don't quite get you - Joerg was asking this: > one of the questions is whether it would be acceptable for everyone to > run a small regression test-suite prior to the QA-approval of a > CWS. These tests would probably run several hours, depending on the > hardware being used, and therefore cost time and hardware-resources. > you already quoted my answer to this, which basically said "yes, but please make sure these additional constraints are also met". So, what are you referring to? Cheers, -- Thorsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
