Hi *,
the OOo release status meeting from 2007/05/15 has accepted a proposal for a new
nomination policy affecting child workspaces with a red tinderbox status
reported in EIS:
Child workspaces with a red tinderbox status need a valid justification when
promoted to "ready for QA" state, otherwise the CWS will be rejected from QA.
The justification is expected to be given from one of the developers involved
(usually the CWS owner) and should explain why it is o.k. to nominate or
integrate the particular child workspace in the current state nonetheless.
Some guidance on what needs to be done when one of your CWS'es is affected
(including a list of known false positives) can be found at
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/RedTinderboxStatusInEIS.
More info on Tinderbox/EIS integration can be found on
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/TinderboxAndEISStatus.
Regards,
Oliver
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
