Joerg Sievers wrote:
Hi!
Hi Joerg,
Bernd Eilers wrote:
Why not mix it?
I forgot something:
As described in the "tool support for life-cycle testing" in "Software
Test Automation", Mark Fewster & Dorothy Graham, Addison Wesley, 1999,
ISBN 0-201-33140-3, on page 7, the "tool support is available for
testing in every stage of the software development life cycle". As they
did not mixed them we also should not do it because they have different
views (e.g. testing =! debugging, so a debugging tool =! test tool).
We are talking about differnt tools:
- Coverage tools (Unit tests)
- Debugging tools (Unit tests, integration tests)
- Dynamic analysis tools (Integration tests)
- *Test execution and comparison tools* (between integration-
and system tests)
[ ... snip lengthy description ...]
I really DO already know that those are different things.
The only very short question I was asking was wether the questions we
currently are asking in regards for one of them might be applied for the
other ones too.
You know like bikes, cars and motorcycles are all different but they all
have wheels.
But I understood and support your argument that we should focus on the
thing started by Joerg before asking only slightly related questions, so
we should do that and not discuss any more about the other types of tests.
Kind regards,
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
