Eike Rathke wrote: > Hi, > > On Friday, 2007-07-06 09:20:57 +0200, Rüdiger Timm wrote: > >> >is based on the source of OOB680 . >> >> Why do you have to use such an old code base? I'd strongly recommend to >> update to f.e. OOF680 m18, the latest release. From my point of view it >> does not make sense to do development based on old code. > > In terms of development I'd even consider the OOF680 branch as way old > and patches don't necessarily apply on SRC680 anymore. I'd recommend > a recent SRC680 milestone instead, currently the latest available being > SRC680_m219.
That depends. If you are developing an extension that should run on the current stable release it's not a bad idea to use this code line for development. But using OOB680 is definitely not recommended. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
