Guys,

my originally mail was not meant to press anybody into any corset, but just to solve the noticed problems regarding the usage of using "using rtl;" :-)

Some of the reasons for the namespace problems we are facing are IMHO simply non optimal placings, e.g. "com::sun::uno::Reference" would have belonged into "cppu" ("cppu::Reference" or may be simply "uno::Reference". As probably most people agree with, the whole "com::sun::star" namespace became obsolete when open sourcing StarOffice and should have been renamed to "OOo" (or similar), and I am sure there are more aspects one currently would like to see being reflected in the namespaces, but ... we want to stay API and ABI compatible, more or less rendering these thoughts useless ;-)

Personally I tend to use aliases as Andreas does, e.g. "css" for "com::sun::star" respectively "cssu" for "com::sun::star::uno".

Regards

  Kay

Andreas Schlüns wrote:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to