Hi Davide,
i think [3] is a special thing and we all agree that it is a sad story.
We should exactly identify what the problems were and should start to
work on them. Does they still exists? Or have some things already changed.
[2] is more or less around the JCA where i don't see that a further
discussion make sense.
If you want to start a discussion around community and community work i
would suggest that you should clearly communicate your concerns. List
all your concerns in detail and ideally suggest ways how we can improve
it. I am sure that we are all open to discuss these points with you.
What i personally don't like to do is a general discussion on a level
where we talk more about politics than about real community work on a
great product.
Well a lot of things can be improved and i think we are working already
on it.
Bring up your concrete concerns and let us discuss
Juergen
Davide Dozza wrote:
Hi all,
some days ago I launched a stone into the water. I posted some
consideration [1] about the OOoCon and more in general about our community.
It seems that things don't happen alone. After the Michael Meeks
announce [2] following the Kohei [3] post I think there is something to
discuss about our "community" and how they should evolve. In fact it
seems clear to me that the actual community rules, and more in general
about how the project is managed, are not anymore suitable to manage
what the Community asks.
I'm deliberating using two terms, "community" and Community, because I
think there is a common misinterpretation about what a community is.
Hoping this start a constructive discussion,
Ciao
Davide
[1]
http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/10/02/openofficeorg-conference-2007-some-thoughts/
[2] http://www.gnome.org/~michael/activity.html#2007-10-02
[3] http://kohei.us/2007/10/02/history-of-calc-solver/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
