Bernd Eilers wrote: > There´s no path to the specification > without the feature mail and thus a fallback to use the specification if > no feature mail is there is not possible. I think it is clear that we *always* should have a feature mail. The spec should be the fallback for the missing description in case the submitter preferred not to copy it from the spec. Not the fallback for a missing feature mail.
> The only possible and really > very rare case fallback szenario here would be to fallback to the text > in the specification abstract if the feature mail did not contain a > description but did contain a spec link. Exactly this is what I suggested in this thread a few days ago. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]". I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
