Ain Vagula wrote:

> Martin Hollmichel wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> in the past there were several complaints raised that some defects and
>> also requirements got not the right priority. In fact we've got a long
>> list of RFE in IssueTracker (either assigned to "requirements" or "bh")
>> and it is not obvious if there is ongoing work on these issues or not.
>> Also it is often not that transparent how decision making on spending
>> resources to that issues is made.
>> 
> 
> I searched some weeks ago issues about improving search-replace dialog 
> (eg. bringing 'selection only' box to unexpanded view). There were 
> dozens of issues about this dialog, big part assigned to "bh" and 
> significant part marked as 'started' since 2004...

This is the usual problem with Issue Tracker. "Started" only means that
the developer that got the issue confirmed that (s)he is the right
person to get it. It's more an "Accepted" status that Issue Tracker is
lacking.

Ciao,
Mathias

-- 
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]".
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to