Hi Pavel, On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 10:00:00AM +0200, you wrote: > - make cwses with new modules tinderboxable (the work is already in > progress) > I'm all for it, and this is the most important point - see below.
> - announce new module (e.g. in cws-announce list) much earlier then > integrating it in the milestone or via issue to add alias or add it to > the OpenOffice* alias. This could be also automated via EIS - see above. > > - peer review of new module by someone who at least knows there is also > configure based environment or that you can use different shells etc. > before the integration of the cws > I believe the two last points follow more or less directly from the first one - hopefully, the tinderboxen cover the range of shells, platforms etc. sufficiently. Back to the first point, I was wondering whether maybe tagging new modules with the CWS tag could be helpful - but then again, maybe changing too much of SCM-related things before the switch to svn is a waste of time... Cheers, -- Thorsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
