Hi Michael, On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Michael Strobel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Either you did not use a correct version of epm, or your rpm ignores >> the "no-automatic requirements" setting. > > Which one is the correct version of epm? I got 4.1 from epmhome.org for the > build.
correct=patched as needed by OOo. At least the older versions of epm needed a patch to make the packages relocatable and to fix the dependency generation stuff. Not sure whether it is still required for 4.1 (probably not for making it relocatable, but maybe still for the requirements) - I always use the internal rpm that is included with the OOo sources. But if the info below is correct, this is not the cause of the problem. >> Sure that it really is not in the package? As opposed to being listed >> in requirements/requires. > > Quite sure. I installed the packages I got with rpm's --force switch, Using --force is almost always a bad idea. Better use only --nodeps if you want to ignore the dependencies. > which > results in complaints about the missing lib(s) when I try to start OOo. So OOo itself complains about the missing libvcl680li.so? And what other libs does it complain about? You didn't write what codeline/Milestone you work on, for but that lib should be in the core04 package. (for OOO300 without the "680", just libvclli.so, so I assume it is OOH680?) Did you check that the lib is in the solver? (and not only in vcl)? And sure that the successfull packaging process belongs to the OpenOffice.org product and not, for example to the SDK? ciao Christian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
