On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 17:34 +0900, Hung Nguyen Vu wrote: > Should I upgrade my gcc? > What version of gcc is recommended for building OOo 3?
Those actual warnings are basically spurious, ignore them. But, I know that your particular compiler, given as it is equivalent to the RHEL-5 gcc, actually probably *does* has a bug with visibility which IIRC may cause OOo to crash when it loads some old .sdw files, the workaround it to disable visibility or to apply the openoffice.org.2.0.3-dangerousvisibility.patch patch found in the RHEL-4/CentOS openoffice.org src.rpm. It's pretty uncommon, but it can happen. If you are just building OOo for hacking around with, then I wouldn't bother changing your compiler for it. I don't think I've met a compiler yet that doesn't have *some* bug that has affected openoffice.org in some way:-), but I'm pretty happy with gcc 4.3.0/4.3.1 whose only known bug that has affected me is with -fasynchronous-unwind-tables on i386 which isn't enabled by default on that architecture anyway. C. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
