2008/9/5 Eike Rathke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Nguyen,
>
> On Thursday, 2008-09-04 12:32:48 +0900, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
>
>> I've noticed unused variables in the code, implicit declaration of
>> function or possibly dangerous type casting... when compiling
>> DEV300_m29.
>>
>> It doesn't hurt but IMO, expunge what we don't need in the code is not
>> a bad idea.
>
> See comment in soltools/mkdepend/makefile.mk:
>
> | # "mkdepend" is written in K&R style C. Modern compilers will generate
> | # lots of warning. There is no point in cleaning this up, so we just
> | # ignore warnings
>
> In the case of "implicit declaration" here defining
> NeedVarargsPrototypes, see def.h, in makefile.mk's CDEFS may help. If
> you like try that out and if it silences the messages down and works
> file a patch issue with the 'tools' project where module 'soltools' is
> part of.
mkdepend is just one part of OOo. It just works. Warning are annoying
but I we can live with it.

Unused variables are different: They take up memory.

Here, by "warning", I am talking about both general cases and some
particular cases.

I have not yet seen all the warning in the dmake log file but first
10000 lines of them are quite
interesting to look at. Just grep -i warning. Lots of.

> Btw, it also doesn't hurt to include the names of module and source code
> file compiled when posting build messages ;-)
I've posted all that dmake has outputed.
http://aoclife.ddo.jp/~vuhung/foss/src/DEV300_m29/dmake_20080904_1155.log




-- 
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu ( Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
[EMAIL PROTECTED] , YIM: vuhung16 , Skype: vuhung16dg
Japan through an eye of a gaijin:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/vuhung/tags/fav/

Reply via email to