Hi Rich, On Tuesday, 2008-10-28 10:58:07 +0200, Rich wrote:
> just rambling here... wouldn't 'svn:eol-type native' make the most sense ? Usually not, it gives headaches with diffs created on, for example, a CrLf system that may not apply as patch on a Lf-only system, or vice versa, or if they do may result in mixed files, which would be even worse. Reasonably modern tools and editors are able to work with Lf-only files, so there is no need for native EOLs. Eike -- OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer. SunSign 0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304 7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't send personal mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use for mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks.
pgp1ES4kRVipn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
