Hi Rene,

>>> Looks like connectivity/prj/build.lst needs a dependency on qadevOOo, or
>>> am I mistaken?
>> You aren't, /me thinks. Feel free to write me a P1 issue, so we can fix
>> this in the next build.
> 
> but please guard this with an ENABLE_QADEVOOO or however it is caled variable
> so that it doesn't break when --disable-qadevooo is specified.

Sure.

> And can such stuff please be communicated?

Which "such stuff"? Assuming that I didn't introduce the build breaker
intentionally, the conclusion is that I simply wasn't aware of the fact
that connectivity did not yet depend on qadevOOo, and that I forgot to
check this. That said, there was nothing to announce, since I can't
announce what I am not aware of. So, what do you refer to here? Or is it
that you don't share the above assumption?

> TIA

Whatever that means.

Ciao
Frank

-- 
- Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer         [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
- Sun Microsystems                      http://www.sun.com/staroffice -
- OpenOffice.org Base                       http://dba.openoffice.org -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to