On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:45 AM, Michael Stahl <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/12/2008 14:43, Nguyen Vu Hung wrote:
>>
>> FYI,
>>
>> I see a lot of "can not" in the file connectivity/source/resource.po.
>> As far as I can tell, it should be "cannot".
>
> hmm, interesting question :)
It is not a question but a proposal :D
And I said, it *SHOULD* be "cannot" while
both "cannot" and "can not" are understandable.

FYI,

"cannot" on google: 514M hit.
"can not" on google 78M hit.

> actually istr both are valid... let's see...
>
> <quote>
> The negative of the auxiliary can, cannot occurs less frequently than the
> contraction can't but much more frequently than can not, which is sometimes
> used for emphasis and to reflect the fact that this locution may be stressed
> on the not as well as on the can. Cannot is Formal, can't relatively
> Informal in writing, and can't is the more frequent in Conversational
> contexts, but it is often appropriate as well even in some Oratorical uses.
> All three forms are Standard. Cannot, like can't, is a very frequent
> replacement for may not.
> </quote>
>
> so, at least this site agrees with me:
> http://www.bartleby.com/68/4/1104.html
>
> another explanation (less official-sounding):
> http://alexfiles.com/cannot.shtml
>
> regards,
> michael
>
> --
> "The greater point about how complexity kills you is really the profound
>  thing, and I have found that it takes programmers a long, long time to
>  truly appreciate this.  They usually overestimate the amount of
>  complexity that can be tolerated.  You can't teach this to people: they
>  won't believe it.  They have to learn the hard way." -- Dan Weinreb
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Nguyen Hung Vu [aka: NVH] ( in Vietnamese: Nguyễn Vũ Hưng )
vuhung16plus{[email protected] , YIM: vuhung16 , Skype: vuhung16dg
A brief profile: http://www.hn.is.uec.ac.jp/~vuhung/Nguyen.Vu.Hung.html

Reply via email to