Hi,

Do you know, how often a CWS returns back to development because of
broken functionality, not fixed issues or process violation?

of course in regards to process violation, nothing would change. I am talking about e.g crashing issues. If the developer tried it and it does not crash anymore, QA should not have to test the scenario again and waste time on reproducing the issue again(and again when closing the issue)

But to check the issues in Master => verified -> closed could be
discussed. Here the numbers are really 99% I think. Nearly all
issues which are fixed in CWS are fixed in Master too.

so I guess we have an agreement to reduce some workload of QA in this Resolved-Verified-Closed chain. In which exact location of it would need to be discussed some more I guess.

Best regards
Max

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org

  • Re: [dev] am... Ingrid Halama
    • Re: [de... Mathias Bauer
      • Re:... Thorsten Ziehm
        • ... Oliver-Rainer Wittmann - Software Engineer - Sun Microsystems
          • ... Thorsten Ziehm
        • ... Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
          • ... Thorsten Ziehm
            • ... Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
        • ... Maximilian Odendahl
          • ... Thorsten Ziehm
            • ... Maximilian Odendahl
              • ... Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
              • ... Maximilian Odendahl
              • ... Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
              • ... Maximilian Odendahl
              • ... Thorsten Ziehm
            • ... Christian Lohmaier
              • ... Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany
            • ... Mechtilde
              • ... Thorsten Ziehm
      • Re:... Martin Hollmichel

Reply via email to