Thorsten Ziehm wrote: > As we talked in many other threads. Where are the problems for testing > a CWS from a BuildBot? You can check fixed, you can test functionality > etc. You are perhaps right, that for automated testing with VCLTestTool > doesn't show always the same results. But for this the QA team from Sun > is working on TestBots. So it isn't needed to adjust the test scripts > for all test environment we will find in the community. > What do you want more? > Builds that reliably represents master builds, I guess. What sense does QAing random builds make? Exaggerating a bit, Mechtilde could then even use a ooo-build-based version for CWS QA, as buildbots also tend to patch a few things (to make the build succeed, usually).
Also pointed out before: prerequisite for a testbot is a buildbot that builds Hamburg-compatible CWS. So you need those anyway, why going two steps at once instead of one after another? Cheers, -- Thorsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
