Hi Bjoern, thanks for pointing us to this, I will forward to the performance project.
I guess it won't help anything on startup performances, and also not much on small/normal documents, but at least for big documents it could make some difference :) Not sure about license compatibility yet, never head about "New" BSD. Thanks, Malte. Bjoern Michaelsen wrote, On 06/03/09 18:12: > Hi List, > > I recently stumbled over this: > http://code.google.com/p/google-sparsehash/ > > Those are a optimized reimplementations of the SGI hash_map optimized for > performance and memory consumption. > The dense_hash_map claims to be at least twice as fast the classical hash_map: > http://google-sparsehash.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/performance.html > > That stuff is licensed "New BSD" and seems to be rather fresh. However, since > improving such a low-level data structure, that is widely used in OOo, might > give interesting performance gains should we maybe keep an eye on that stuff? > > Opinions? > > Have Fun, > > Bjoern > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
