Thorsten Ziehm wrote: > > Not difficult if you ignore problems ;-( > > I don't think, that Heiner ignore problem reports. He was very open > for comments for this pilot and did a lot to evaluate problems. As you > can read he has listed positive and also negative feedback. Also your > feedback is listed with the result he had taken from the discussion.
No, it's listed with what he told me in the discussion. Which was frankfly speaking not a discussion at all but he just pointing out what he pointed out in this "summary". Again, I don't believe the arguments at all a) our mercurial package *has* .sos and is still slow -> the native libs argument doesn't hold. He didn't even tell me what I should check when I asked him. At least Debians mecurial package is not at fault. b) he said the low mem/slow cpu/slow(er) hd combination was at fault That does not explain why it's equally slow on a (quite) up-to-date machine. > So please be constructive with your feedback and be friendly. I am. Regards, Rene --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
