T. J. Frazier <tjfrazier <at> cfl.rr.com> writes: > My thought is to put the table itself at the top (with a brief > introduction), and let all the explanations follow, with no other > external links. > From our point of view, it makes maintenance easier and more reliable. > For the users, the table is what they're going to want to refer to, > probably over and over; having it at the top makes it easy to find. If > we tune the section headers so that they have the same names as the > table entries, then the users can use the TOC to go straight to some > individual explanation they need to look up. Or, on-page links to the > sections would be easy enough.
Yeah, maybe that would be better. Originally, I intended not having that stuff on the top because a big table might scare away newcomers. > All this is a fairly major reshuffle. If you have no major objections, > I'll do it, but your critical review (of the plan, and the result) is > very important: I've never built OO.o at all. Go ahead, Ill have a look later (just make sure that you dont drop any footnotes ;-) ). Maybe you could also update the linux stuff to the same format. BTW, I too rarely do "manual" community builds on windows myself (Im working on linux and use buildbots whereever I can). Have Fun, Bjoern --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
