Stephan Bergmann wrote: > >no, the decision was to put only final milestone builds to > >hg.services.openoffice.org/DEV300. > > I think I remember there was some announcement to handle masterfixes > differently, but cannot find it. Anyway, would it not make more > sense to commit masterfixes directly on the master, in between > commits of completed milestones? That way, CWS that are hit by the > masterfixed problem could easily be updated. > Indeedly. Committing to DEV300_next defeats the whole purpose of masterfixes, namely fixing the build for the people out there. Using the next master milestone, one could simply setup a quickfix CWS, and following the normal CWS processes. Masterfixes were specifically designed to be _exemptions_ from the CWS process.
Cheers, -- Thorsten
pgp63ntTLs4nT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
