On 10/03/2010 14:57, Thorsten Behrens wrote: > Stephan Bergmann wrote: >>> * use of fundamental types like long and int. >>> >>> Whereas I think the former is quite sensible (also the added >>> SAL_NO_VTABLE), I have some issues with the latter. Are there any >>> reasons _in favor_ of that, except for platform apis & the >>> occasional loop counter? >> Yes: different semantics. >> >> On the one hand: >> >> [bunch of good examples snipped] >> > Hi Stephan, > > sure, I buy those. Would then be worthwhile to re-def the types you > listed in terms of their C/std:: counterparts. Can do that. > sal_sChar is indeed unused, sal_uChar not so much (but there should > be a trivial 1:1 mapping). > > Or better even, mass-move things like sal_Size/PtrDiff over to > size_t etc.
hmm... and what about this crapfest: /tools/inc/tools/solar.h uhm... typedef int FASTBOOL ? seriously? regards, michael -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
