On 06/24/10 13:07, Bartosz wrote:
"BOOL -> bool" will cause problems. Memory usage for "new BOOL[n]", mixed
use with sal_Bool (pointers, references), the occasional "special" value
(SfxChildWinInfo::bVisible). Shouldn't we go the safe way and change BOOL to
sal_Bool instead?
I agree with you Niklas. It will be much better/safer to change FASTBOOL to
sal_Bool.
I was talking about BOOL, not FASTBOOL. FASTBOOL usage is much more
limited. Replacing FASTBOOL with bool seems possible and more in line
with its original intention. I agree with Stephan that it's best to
remove the FASTBOOL type altogether and change the places where it's
used (much fewer than for BOOL).
Niklas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.org
