On 01/20/2011 10:42 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 01/19/11 13:58, Martin Hollmichel wrote: >> On 01/19/2011 12:51 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: >>> On 01/19/11 12:19, Martin Hollmichel wrote: >>>> * branch off for release will happen after stabilization phase >>> >>> "Stabilization phase" might be an unlucky term here. I hope it is not >>> meant to imply that there are phases where only select CWS (those >>> stabilizing the to-be-branched-off release) are allowed into the >>> DEV300 master. >> I think this is a "one off" we need to go through for the 3.4 release. > > But why is it better to put the 3.4 stabilization phase before 3.4 > branch off, instead of after? the main point is to do the stabilization phase early, the actual branch off date is secondary beside this saves some work in Release Engineering, > > -Stephan Martin
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
