Hello PJ I am fully AWARE that the release must follow the rules. What we are doing now is a DRY RUN of the process using the github snapshot .
I am asking two PMC to do the test from the repo, then we start with the formal process. Sorry of the misunderstanding. Michele Sciabarra | CPO m: +44 747 984 8388 e: [email protected] l: https://linkedin.com/in/msciab Nuvolaris Inc | 1209 Orange Street, 19801Wilmington DE - US www.nuvolaris.io linkedin.com/in/msciab On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 at 23:18, PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote: > this is not the way that Apache releases work. > You must follow: > https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html > and https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html > > The release must be approved by an explicit vote thread on this dev list > and then on [email protected]. > > > On 2026/07/14 08:58:49 Michele Sciabarra wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > we fixed a few bugs in the current snapshot and we have a number of > > reports including one from our PMC Francois Papon that the sources on > > the main branch builds and tests. > > > > We have enough success reports from the committers (Bruno, Francesco, > > Michele, Daniele) > > > > Once we get one more from another of the PMC we have the required > > quorum to proceed to prepare a tarball from the main branch and do our > > first source release. > > > > The release will be 0.9.0, in the meanwhile we already started to work > > on 0.9,1 on branches (adding SSO, the embedded image builder and > > more). > > > > -- > > Michele Sciabarrà - [email protected] - linkedin.com/in/msciab > > Apache OpenServerless committer - reddit.com/r/openserverless > > Apache OpenWhisk PMC member - Author Learning Apache OpenWhisk > > >
