On Feb 16, 2008 2:12 PM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > What has already been done on data checks, and is anyone else working > on > > > it? What would be some good ideas to start with, and goals to work > toward? > > > I've coded a script to parse planet and return a list of all the > > excessively long ways (data is available from > > http://openstreetmap.ca/statistics/) which I am currently manually > > correcting (in this case the excessively large is defined as more then > > 500 nodes). Kleptog has the coastline error checker which has been > > extremely helpful as well, and I believe has been used to fix the little > > coast errors that the checker turns up in some areas. > > One thing that isn't been done at them moment is referential > integrity checks. Theoretically there must not be any ways or > relations referring to deleted or non-existent other objects, but > every now and then one turns up (people report strange errors, you > check it and find there's an inconsistency). >
Actually, Osmosis already has an integrity checker. Karl
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
