Hi, > What about implicitely creating a new changeset if none is > given, so that a transition is smooth?
I did suggest that on the Wiki page. > Can anyone suggest to handle the case of user B > editing entities that are edited in the changeset > of A before AND after the edit of B? Difficult but I hope we can ignore that. Individual objects still have their version numbers as they have now, so in your scenario: > A: open changeset > A: move point X to the left > B: move point X a bit north > A: move point X to the a bit more left > A: close changeset B's change would have the higher version number but be part of a changeset with an earlier date than A - slightly quirky but not really cause for concern. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00.09' E008°23.33' _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
