On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:39 AM, bvh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I disagree. Requiring mappers to add two ways that overlap > completly is with the goal of making the math simpler is > shifting the burden from software to users.
On Mar 14, 2008, at 16:32, 80n wrote: > Sometimes this is unavoidable. Consider a commercial area > (landuse=commercial) surrounded by a residential area > (landuse=residential). It's not possible to create a single way > that can be used as the boundary for both these features as they > would both need to specify different values for the landuse tag. There's no need to put a landuse=residential on the way surrounding the commercial area. Putting tags on the outer way suffices. Cheers Robert _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
