Frederik Ramm wrote: >> Believe it or not, I was being ironic when I wrote that. > > It was quite obvious that you were using the term "anarcho- > collaborativist" to pour scorn on my statement that the people who > cast votes in our project have no authority.
Nothing as strong as scorn. I was merely stating what seemed to be the logical consequences of your position. Is anarchy not _defined_ as "no-one has any authority"? > On the other hand, starting to think of oneself (or one's project) as > "important" may be the beginning of the end of fun. I don't agree. The Mozilla project has been and continues to be highly important to keeping an open web, but I have a lot of fun working on it, as do many other people :-) > I don't know if you really *believe* that anyone who is against voting > in a project will surely accept his flat being burgled, That's not a fair summary of my position. > or if that is > just some kind of rhetoric that you employ to drag your opponents in > the mud. I'm sorry if you feel dragged in the mud; that was not my intention at all. Gerv _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
