Let me add my 5 cents here by giving support to bart's proposal. This would make the OSM data more reliable and the OSM process more professional.
- Stefan 2008/5/5 bvh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 02:08:48PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: > > Do you have some sort of persecution complex? Do you really > > think we're all out to get you or something? > > In fact no. I just want OSM to improve and point to areas where > it is missing opportunities to improve. > Maybe I worded things a little sharp but hopefully > my suspicion of lacking communication skills is just as > misguided as your suspicions re my mental sanity. > > From my POV, here is how the process can be improved concretly > > - don't hold low-key meetings. Sure, invite only a few key > driving people to improve efficiency but communicate about it > openly. I'd go even as far as saying the more intimate you > make the meeting, to more public you should be about it. > - take notes as you go and publish them as widely as possible > - announce important stuff (for developers) on the dev mailing list > as early as possible (certainly before linking them on the wiki) > - think twice before casually setting a date on changes > that will break current setup for everyone > - use the wiki as a reservoir of information, not as a notification > board > > cu bart > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
