On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 02:43:19PM +0100, Andrew Chadwick (email lists) wrote: > You _don't know_ where the edge of the rendered road will be but that > it'll lie within a certain zone. Thus you infect the edge of the abutted > area with that uncertainty, and for most buildings, fields, residential > areas, or any other Area that doesn't make sense. It's abusing the fact
The uncertainty introduced by our GPS devices is probably an order of magnitude bigger than the uncertainty on the width of a road, I think your arguments are not holding up. I'd advice to re-use the nodes for forest/grass/landuse and whatever to express the fact that it runs right up to the road. For things like buildings, I'd probably not reuse the nodes since there is most of the time a clearly distinct zone between the building and the road. For that zone (in campus's it's mostly grass) I'd reuse both the nodes of the building and the road. cu bart _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
