On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:40:40PM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > Now who is unilaterally making decisions? :) Sorry the wiki wasn't clear > enough.
If you look at the irc log from tonight you 'll clearly see that all I am looking for is documentation for the current state of affairs. > It's supposed to be old_version and that what JOSM implements but I'm > fine either way. The reasoning being that it's clearly not the version > being uploaded and in some contexts (diff output) you might want > old_version and new_version. But apparently the server code expects version, not old_version. Personally I slightly prefer version as it would then become identical code from just saving the file. > > - When creating, updating or deleting a single object the wiki > > says that you need to add the changeset and old_version attributes > > but does not state on which tag. crschmidt and me agreed on IRC > > that > > > > * the changeset attribute should be on the osm tag > > * the version attribute should be on the object tag > At the hackathon we had quite a bit of discussion about this and we > decided they should both go on the object tag (the reason escapes me > right now, I'm sure it will come to me. something to do with being > consistant with how the data will be retreived). This is also what > JOSM implements. This is inconsistent with section 1.5 of the wiki page on 0.6 that says the changeset_id attribute should be on the osm tag for diff upload. So it would be interesting to find out the reason for this difference. > Just as long as we end up with one way of doing it and not lots of variations. Ain't that the definition of an API? cu bart _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
