On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Christopher Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, I see now. I think that this changeset identifier is *not* the one > you want to reupload though, so the fact that it is stored on the > individual objects, and the 'new' changeset is stored on the <osm> tag, > actually makes perfect sense: when you download, you get a copy of the > last changeset, when you upload, you're sticking things into a new > changeset.
Yes, I thought of this later also. So we do indeed want both. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
