OJ W schreef: >> Is there a reason not to implement it this way? > > Recursive/circular relations?
Currently also not guaranteed with relations. My extra suggestion having an index will guarantee sequence. > Not being able to guarantee that all ways are before all relations in > the planet.osm? Why would this be an issue? Is it convenient to have nodes, ways, relations? Ways would be a subset of relations if you want to order it by type :) that is fairly trivial. > No code for it in SVN? We are not the ClosedStreetMap group. The that was used to make MonetDB running is based on planet-to-osm.pl. And the code that I produced already was send to the other teaming working on the MySQL variant. But if you would like to see code in SVN ;) Lets figure something out how to get it there. But this moves the discussion from theoretical to technical. Stefan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
