According to Real Ed Parsons (via AllPointsBlog) it only includes the moved addresses, not the MapMaker. -- James Fee RSP Architects
Sent via BlackBerry ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Openstreetmap Dev list <[email protected]> Sent: Mon Jun 30 21:12:42 2008 Subject: Re: [OSM-dev] Google Map Maker Finally some concrete information about Google's Map Maker strategy. "Google Signs Five Year Map Agreement with Tele Atlas": http://www.gisdevelopment.net/news/viewn.asp?id=GIS:N_batyqsincw That definitely blows my best-case scenario out of the water, but in an ironic way I think it is still a good development. It provides us with something real to compete against. That makes it easier to identify weak spots and increases motivation to work on them. Because contrary to Google, OpenStreetMap does not chronically depend on add revenue, it has three strategic advantages: 1 - it can give anyone access to all data, in any format 2 - it can distribute hosting and serving of this data ([EMAIL PROTECTED] is a good example) 3 - it can collaborate with as many partners as it wants (I don't think Google can easily expand its Tele Altas deal to other map providers.) But it is not enough to just tell people how good it is that their data is free (Freedom v.s. beer); we have to prove it! So I'll get back to work now and help with that :-) Sjors _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
