Frederik Ramm wrote: > It seems obvious that areas, like ways, need to be
were > based on a sequence > of nodes. [...] > > An area with no holes inside would trivially have had > the exact same > structure as a way, perhaps using <area> instead of <way>. Was it 0.2 or 0.3 that had areas? Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose. cheers Richard _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
