2008/7/25 Fire Girl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hey, that is great -- and Cheers! > > When you get back, it would be interesting to find out, what kinda of > results you get from a two stage extraction, using the same commands, > > java.exe -jar osmosis.jar" --rx "planet-latest.osm.bz2" > enableDateParsing="YES" --lp interval="600" --bb left="-108" right="-36" > top="90" bottom="0" --wx "segment_earth.osm" > > and then, > > java.exe -jar osmosis.jar" --rx "segment_earth.osm" enableDateParsing="YES" > --lp interval="600" --bb left="-75" right="-73" top="42" bottom="40" --wx > "new_york_area.osm" > ^^^ this is what is yielding a 27 MB file from the 2.5 GB segment_earth.osm > slice, when according to my test doing this above same command & parameters > against a planet.osm yielded almost a 1.3 GB file :| > > I mean, it is pretty clear I got a very slimmed down segment_earth.osm > extraction.... left="-108" right="-36" top="90" bottom="0", is a pretty big > cross-section which yielded 2.5 GB. Which is totally confusing since I got > 1.3 GB from left="-75" right="-73" top="42" bottom="40", ... a tiny 2 degree > cross segment! This is driving me nuts! haha > > BTW, can you perform this test on a Windows Machine like I am? :)) > > I'll give it a shot, too on my Windows laptop (I have a copy of planet) once I get to work. One thing I would recommend is that you get a new version of Osmosis and then stop using the very slow date parsing. The new version just preserves the dates as strings.
Karl
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
