On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Enforcing the expiry or closing of changesets gives us the chance to
> know for sure that certain changesets - most, actually - are "complete"
> and will not change anymore; you can then say for sure: "user so-and-so
> made the following changes in changeset so-and-so".
I'm also with Frederik on this one - I wouldn't want a notification
application to keep emailing me about what people are doing halfway
through a changeset - therefore, it would be better to know when
changesets are done and dusted.
Which was one of the main driving points behind changesets - they are
the foundation for some proposed anti-vandalism work ("monitoring and
rollback" was the project moniker), as well as the db efficiency stuff
Matt referred to.
Cheers,
Andy
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
