On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Shaun McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What you say is correct in terms of the database (the uid field will be > renamed to changeset_id). The API however will still be returning the user > and also the uid and changeset_id from API 0.6, so that it doesn't break too > many things, or require the need to get each changeset, for the user > information. I wouldn't characterise this as a done deal - everything is still up for discussion. I'm especially interested in what people discussed at the last hackathon whilst I wasn't paying attention... Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
