On 22 Nov 2008, at 21:49, Stefan de Konink wrote: > >> Other OSM tools require MySQL and PostgreSQL/PostGIS: We don't want >> to >> load 150GB of data in three databases...!!! And many like to maintain >> only one webserver (Apache) and no other at the same time. > > It sucks I agree :) But why would you need the other two databases if > this thing gives you the performance (and better) of MySQL, and the > GIS > objects of PostGIS? >
Do you have a report detailing the performance differences, with documentation of the setup used, so that those result could be reproduced? Shaun _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
