Andy Allan wrote:

> As for the 150 entries, that only seems to apply to the update method,
> as far as my reading of the code goes. YMMV, but it seems fine to make
> 151 calls to the update_one method instead. It's probably best to
> avoid bulk updating more than 150 entries but I'm not certain what
> Steve was planning when he wrote it originally.

I suspect what he *wasn't* thinking of was editors trying to store 
hundreds of user preferences in there, that's for sure ;-)

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
http://www.compton.nu/

_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to