Armijn Hemel wrote: > That's great to hear. Please read the CBP publications: > > http://www.cbpweb.nl/downloads_rs/rs_20071211_persoonsgegevens_op_internet_definitief.pdf > > page 12, section 'IP-adres'
Lets say, in this 'subtext' they write exactly the problem. "Can be correlated by the internet provider". And this will give a lead to the bill payer. Now directly under this piece of text is written the 'thought 26'. Which they have used in both writing to questions to me about 'profile site identification and direct marketing' (January 2008) and 'identification based on postalcodes' (July 2008). But thanks for pointing me at their own sources, I stand corrected, more interesting if this is the current opinion, my claim first claim to them is valid :) and they have wrongly applied their own rules. Stefan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
