On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 09:29:50PM +1100, Brett Henderson wrote: > Jochen Topf wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 12:06:59PM +1100, Brett Henderson wrote: > > > >> However it should be very fast now. I recently implemented a change to > >> keep the date as a string internally (I thought I sent you an email > >> about this, could be wrong). If it is written to xml again the previous > >> date string is used unchanged. If it is written to something like a > >> database then the string will be parsed when it is required. Even if > >> parsing does occur, the custom code used internally is orders of > >> magnitude faster than standard java xml date parsing classes. It is the > >> same code I submitted for JOSM though so has been around for some time now. > >> > > > > So can we get rid of the option? > > > It is still useful if the input file doesn't include timestamps. I > remember somebody using that recently. I'll add a comment to the wiki > to let people know it isn't useful for speed any more.
Shouldn't Osmosis be able to see by itself that there is no timestamp to parse in that case? Jochen -- Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org http://www.remote.org/jochen/ +49-721-388298 _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev