Matthias Julius wrote: >>> Key uniqueness robs us of some cool things but we get simplicity in >>> return which is a price worth paying in this particular case, I think. >> Using the misused thing called relations we are able to do most of the >> things we want. But if there was a vote I would go for the unique k/v >> thing because of the *non* semantics and *non* duplicates for an amenity >> that is 'both'. > > I would say relations are not misused, they are misnamed. They should > have been named "object" and a relation would only be one kind of > object. Then everything could be made into an object that references > ways and/or nodes.
s/ways/other objects/g And it actually makes sense ;) Stefan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
