Rolf Bode-Meyer wrote: > Reading that and comparing the results I see they're matching. So I > comprehend what's going on. > But I must confess I don't agree that this is going on (though that > won't help anything I guess). Either one counts the whole border as > being part of the result or none of it. But ok, in my case having the > whole border-defining-multipolygon inside it's a minor issue. > It would be less confusing I agree. But without changing to a different polygon library I can't do much about it.
Brett _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
