Tom Hughes wrote: > Yeah, it really is that simple, which is why us simple minded idiots > that run the server are still doing it all in memory.
There are at least 3 known alternative implementations that run semi-realtime :) So yeah keeping it in rails while there are alternatives make you stubborn. Your last arguments were that you don't want to manage such infrastructure... that makes much more sense here. Don't forget our last IRC conversation where you were unable to tell me why a specific FCGI client was borking on any request (get/put). While a new request just worked. This indicates there are more problems with Ruby-on-Rails read/write actions than you are now talking about now. Stefan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
