On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Tom Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > Frederik Ramm wrote: > > Tom, > > > > Tom Hughes wrote: > >>> Also, I read from the foundation meeting minutes that the code to > >>> handle the technical side of the planned license change has already > >>> been mostly completed > > > > [...] > > > >> There is some code on my hard disk that I will be working on > >> completing over the next few weeks. As it isn't on a branch it > >> probably won't be committed before it is ready to go live though. It > >> isn't a huge amount of code though. > > > > Does your code take into account the plan that people should have the > > option of saying "no", "yes", and "yes and by the way all my data is PD > > anyway"? > > It implements the Foundation's relicensing plan - you'll have to discuss > the details of that with the Foundation.
There has been no discussion of a PD option at any of the OSMF board meetings that I have attended (I don't think I've missed any), and no mention in any of the minutes from the License Working Group. So, as far as I know, the answer is that the only options that have been considered are YES or NO. Etienne > > Tom > > -- > Tom Hughes ([email protected]) > http://www.compton.nu/ > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
